Washington Meal & Rest Break Calculator
Determine mandatory rest breaks and meal periods across any shift length under WAC 296-126-092. Calculates uncompensated working time under Washington's established compensable hours doctrine (Pellino v. Brink’s Inc.) without confusing Washington law with California's 1-hour statutory penalty.
Washington Meal & Rest Break Pay Calculator (WAC 296-126-092)
Evaluate break compliance and uncompensated work time under Washington State labor standards. Washington administrative law mandates paid 10-minute rest breaks every 4 hours and 30-minute meal periods for shifts exceeding 5 hours.CRITICAL WASHINGTON LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Unlike California (Labor Code § 226.7), Washington law DOES NOT grant an automatic 1-hour statutory penalty. Under Pellino v. Brink’s Inc. (164 Wn. App. 688), missed or interrupted breaks represent compensable working time owed as actual regular or overtime wages.
Enter your shift length and breaks provided, then click Evaluate Break Compliance.
Washington Meal & Rest Break Rules & Precedent
Examine WAC 296-126-092 rest and meal scheduling rules, the Court of Appeals decision in Pellino v. Brink’s Inc., the Washington Supreme Court standard in Brady v. Autozone, and why Washington wage law does not follow California’s 1-hour statutory break penalty.
Washington State Workplace Break Law & Legal Remedies
Mandatory Rest Breaks (WAC 296-126-092(4))
Washington requires at least one paid 10-minute rest break for every 4 hours worked. Rest breaks are fully paid time. An employee cannot be scheduled to work more than 3 consecutive hours without a rest period. Employers cannot require workers to stay on site during paid rest breaks.
30-Minute Meal Periods (WAC 296-126-092(1))
Employees working more than 5 consecutive hours must receive an uninterrupted 30-minute meal period commencing between the second and fifth working hour. If the shift exceeds 10 hours, a second 30-minute meal period is mandatory before the 11th hour.
The Pellino Compensable Time Doctrine
In Pellino v. Brink’s Inc. (164 Wn. App. 688), the Court of Appeals held that missed rest breaks and on-duty meal breaks constitute uncompensated labor. The remedy under Washington law is payment of actual back wages for all uncompensated working time at regular or overtime rates.
Employer Duty: Brady v. Autozone Stores
In Brady v. Autozone Stores, Inc. (188 Wn.2d 576), the Washington Supreme Court ruled that employers have an affirmative duty to provide meal and rest breaks. A mere policy allowing breaks is insufficient; the employer must actively ensure that breaks are taken or compensate the unprovided time.